Trusted Reviews is supported by its audience. If you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a commission.Learn more.
The EU wants to make the X blue tick great again
In This Article
The European Union has continued its hands-on approach to all things tech; this time singling out the perversion of the Twitter/X blue ticks.
Once a means of properly verifying the identity of a public figure or supplier of important information, the blue tick has undergone a revamp in the era of Elon Musk ownership.
Galaxy Z Fold 6 with 100GB of data and free Galaxy Buds 3
Mobiles UK is offering the Galaxy Z Fold 6 for £74.99 a month (+ £79 upfront) with 100GB data on the iD Mobile network. Freebies include the Galaxy Buds 3 and S Pen case
Musk now offers the check marks to anyone who is willing to pay him a few quid a month for an X Premium membership (formerlyTwitter Blue), along with access to tools like tweet edits and boosted visibility of tweets within its algorithm.
And the EU has taken a dim view of this practice and believes the company is in violation of the bloc’s Digital Services Act (DSA).
Following an investigation that began in December 2023, the EU has preliminarilydeterminedthe way blue ticks currently work “does not correspond to industry practice and deceives users. Since anyone can subscribe to obtain such a “verified” status, it negatively affects users’ ability to make free and informed decisions about the authenticity of the accounts and the content they interact with. There is evidence of motivated malicious actors abusing the “verified account” to deceive users.”
As a result, if the preliminary findings are confirmed, Twitter might face a big fine (up to 6% of the total annual worldwide turnover) and be forced to make changes that will ensure the feature complies with the DSA.
Thierry Breton, Commissioner for Internal Market said: “Back in the day, BlueChecks used to mean trustworthy sources of information. Now with X, our preliminary view is that they deceive users and infringe the DSA. We also consider that X’s ads repository and conditions for data access by researchers are not in line with the DSA transparency requirements. X has now the right of defence — but if our view is confirmed we will impose fines and require significant changes.”
You might like…
Chris Smith is a freelance technology journalist for a host of UK tech publications, including Trusted Reviews. He’s based in South Florida, USA. …
Founded in 2003, Trusted Reviews exists to give our readers thorough, unbiased and independent advice on what to buy.
Today, we have millions of users a month from around the world, and assess more than 1,000 products a year.
Editorial independence means being able to give an unbiased verdict about a product or company, with the avoidance of conflicts of interest. To ensure this is possible, every member of the editorial staff follows a clear code of conduct.
We also expect our journalists to follow clear ethical standards in their work. Our staff members must strive for honesty and accuracy in everything they do. We follow the IPSO Editors’ code of practice to underpin these standards.
Why trust our journalism?
Founded in 2003, Trusted Reviews exists to give our readers thorough, unbiased and independent advice on what to buy.
Today, we have millions of users a month from around the world, and assess more than 1,000 products a year.
Editorial independence means being able to give an unbiased verdict about a product or company, with the avoidance of conflicts of interest. To ensure this is possible, every member of the editorial staff follows a clear code of conduct.
We also expect our journalists to follow clear ethical standards in their work. Our staff members must strive for honesty and accuracy in everything they do. We follow the IPSO Editors’ code of practice to underpin these standards.
