Trusted Reviews is supported by its audience. If you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a commission.Learn more.

Meta Quest 3S vs Meta Quest 3: What’s the difference?

In This Article

In This Article

Meta has unveiled the Meta Quest 3S, which is a more affordable version of the Meta Quest 3 mixed reality headset, but what’s the difference between the two reality shifting gadgets?

While wowing with itsMeta Orion ARglasses, the company also chose the Meta Connect keynote to debut a new, low-cost version of theMeta Quest 3headset – slapping an S on the end and dropping the price significantly.

“Quest 3S is the best headset for those new to mixed reality and immersive experiences and for those who might’ve been waiting for a low-cost upgrade from Quest and Quest 2,” Meta says in a blog post to announce the launch, which also spells the end of the road for the Quest 2.

There are plenty of similarities, including the same Qualcomm Snapdragon XR2 Gen2 processor with 8GB of RAM, while full-colour passthrough is also supported. Design is similar, all the Quest 3 experiences will be playable, and the same accessories come as standard. Here’s what’s different.

Slightly different external design.

Slightly different external design.

The Quest 3 has three openings for camera lenses and sensors in the front of the display, while the Quest 3S offers six openings at eye level. This will be because of the differing display technology.

Meta Quest 3S has less capable displays

The Meta Quest 3 provides a brilliant display experience with a 2064 × 2208 resolution per eye and 25 pixels per degree, which amounts to a 4K+ resolution overall. The Meta Quest 3S defaults back to the Quest 2 resolution of 1832 x 1920 per eye with 20 pixels per degree.

The pancake optics that made such a difference to the image quality in the Quest 3 and also decreased the physical footprint, are also missing from the Quest 3S, with Meta opting for the fresnel lenses that were present in the Quest 2.

Our reviewer of the Quest 3 commented: “That significant size reduction is down to the inclusion of an upgraded pancake lens system, which is not only more compact than the fresnel-based system of its predecessor but delivers much clearer optics.”

Quest 3S has slightly better battery life

Those less advanced displays are less power hungry, it seems, because Meta says the Quest 3S will last for about 2.5 hours from a single charge, while the Quest 3 lasts for 2.2 hours on average.

Quest 3S is much cheaper

The Quest 3S costs £289.99/ $299.99 with 128GB of storage, while a 256GB version will set you back £379.99/$399.99. The cuts to the hardware make it a much cheaper option than the Quest 3. It’s £190/$200 cheaper than the original Quest 3 with 128GB of storage. There’s some movement in price coming there though, including a 512GB version that’ll cost $500 (UK pricing to be confirmed).

You might like…

Chris Smith is a freelance technology journalist for a host of UK tech publications, including Trusted Reviews. He’s based in South Florida, USA.  …

Founded in 2003, Trusted Reviews exists to give our readers thorough, unbiased and independent advice on what to buy.

Today, we have millions of users a month from around the world, and assess more than 1,000 products a year.

Editorial independence means being able to give an unbiased verdict about a product or company, with the avoidance of conflicts of interest. To ensure this is possible, every member of the editorial staff follows a clear code of conduct.

We also expect our journalists to follow clear ethical standards in their work. Our staff members must strive for honesty and accuracy in everything they do. We follow the IPSO Editors’ code of practice to underpin these standards.

Why trust our journalism?

Founded in 2003, Trusted Reviews exists to give our readers thorough, unbiased and independent advice on what to buy.

Today, we have millions of users a month from around the world, and assess more than 1,000 products a year.

Editorial independence means being able to give an unbiased verdict about a product or company, with the avoidance of conflicts of interest. To ensure this is possible, every member of the editorial staff follows a clear code of conduct.

We also expect our journalists to follow clear ethical standards in their work. Our staff members must strive for honesty and accuracy in everything they do. We follow the IPSO Editors’ code of practice to underpin these standards.