Trusted Reviews is supported by its audience. If you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a commission.Learn more.

Apple lodges appeal against Apple Watch 9 and Ultra 2 ban

In This Article

In This Article

As expected, Apple is appealing the import ban, whichforced it to remove two flagship models from salein the United States during the busy holiday shopping period.

Both theApple Watch Series 9andApple Watch Ultra 2are currently unavailable from the Apple Store in the US because of an International Trade Commission ruling that the smartwatch’s blood oxygen sensor technology infringes on patents held by the medical device maker Masimo.

Save £30 on the 2023 Backbone One for iPhone 15

The Backbone One (2023) is available for for just £69.99 on Amazon. That’s a saving of £30 or 30%. It’s a must-have accessory for iPhone gaming and now it’s compatible with the newest Apple smartphones.

Apple had taken precautionary action in removing the watches from sale in the hope of a reprieve from the White House, which could have vetoed the import ban. However, the Biden Administration chose not to intervene and thus Apple cannot currently sell its own best timepieces.

Now Apple is lodging an appeal against the USITC’s decision with the US Customs and Border Protection agency, claiming the exclusion order is causing the company to “suffer irreparable harm”.

“We strongly disagree with the USITC decision and resulting exclusion order, and are taking all measures to return Apple Watch Series 9 and Apple Watch Ultra 2 to customers in the U.S. as soon as possible,” Apple said in a statement first reported byReuters.

Apple hadpreviously hoped that a software fix might negate the issueand allow it to keep the Apple Watch models on sale, but both Masimo and the ITC argued this was a hardware issue and no changes to how the software operated would change that.

After the ruling Masimo CEO said: “These guys have been caught with their hands in the cookie jar. This is not an accidental infringement — this is a deliberate taking of our intellectual property. I am glad the world can now see we are the true inventors and creators of these technologies.”

It’s not clear how long the appeal will take and whether Apple can find a way to have the ban lifted in the interim.

You might like…

You might like…

Chris Smith is a freelance technology journalist for a host of UK tech publications, including Trusted Reviews. He’s based in South Florida, USA.  …

Founded in 2003, Trusted Reviews exists to give our readers thorough, unbiased and independent advice on what to buy.

Today, we have millions of users a month from around the world, and assess more than 1,000 products a year.

Editorial independence means being able to give an unbiased verdict about a product or company, with the avoidance of conflicts of interest. To ensure this is possible, every member of the editorial staff follows a clear code of conduct.

We also expect our journalists to follow clear ethical standards in their work. Our staff members must strive for honesty and accuracy in everything they do. We follow the IPSO Editors’ code of practice to underpin these standards.

Why trust our journalism?

Founded in 2003, Trusted Reviews exists to give our readers thorough, unbiased and independent advice on what to buy.

Today, we have millions of users a month from around the world, and assess more than 1,000 products a year.

Editorial independence means being able to give an unbiased verdict about a product or company, with the avoidance of conflicts of interest. To ensure this is possible, every member of the editorial staff follows a clear code of conduct.

We also expect our journalists to follow clear ethical standards in their work. Our staff members must strive for honesty and accuracy in everything they do. We follow the IPSO Editors’ code of practice to underpin these standards.