Trusted Reviews is supported by its audience. If you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a commission.Learn more.
Another regulator wants to block the Microsoft Activision deal
In This Article
Another major regulator is looking to block the proposed Microsoft deal to acquire Activision Blizzard.
While the EU might be content towave throughMicrosoft’s proposed deal to acquire the Call of Duty and Diablo 4 maker, the UK’s CMA has thrown aspanner in the worksof late. Now you can add the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to the ‘against’ column.
Afterinitially filingto block the deal in US courts back in December, the FTC is now seeking a temporary restraining order from a US federal district court to stop the deal from going through.
Black Friday-level iPhone 14 deal
Now you’re chance to get the iPhone 14 with 100GB of data for just £36.99 a month and absolutely nothing to pay upfront.
“Both a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction are necessary because Microsoft and Activision have represented that they may consummate the proposed acquisition at any time,” reads the request (viaThe Verge).
“Press reports began circulating suggesting that defendants were seriously contemplating closing the proposed acquisition despite the pending administrative litigation and the CMA orders”.
With the deal’s July 18 deadline fast approaching, the FTC clearly feared that Microsoft would force through the Activision Blizzard acquisition despite opposition from the UK Competition and Markets Authority.
Microsoft and Activision Blizzard, for their part, have indicated that such a legal move in the US might actually be positive for the prospective deal, as it will accelerate the process – assuming their various appeals are successful, of course.
The proposed $69 billion Activision Blizzard deal has faced strong opposition since it was announced, not least from Sony, which fears that the lucrative Call of Duty series will eventually become an Xbox exclusive.
Back in July, it emerged that the PS5 maker hadfiled a complaintin the Brazilian courts on the grounds that Microsoft owning the Call of Duty brand would “influence users’ choice of console”.
You might like…
Jon is a seasoned freelance writer who started covering games and apps in 2007 before expanding into smartphones and consumer tech, dabbling in lifestyle and media coverage along the way. Besides bein…
Founded in 2003, Trusted Reviews exists to give our readers thorough, unbiased and independent advice on what to buy.
Today, we have millions of users a month from around the world, and assess more than 1,000 products a year.
Editorial independence means being able to give an unbiased verdict about a product or company, with the avoidance of conflicts of interest. To ensure this is possible, every member of the editorial staff follows a clear code of conduct.
We also expect our journalists to follow clear ethical standards in their work. Our staff members must strive for honesty and accuracy in everything they do. We follow the IPSO Editors’ code of practice to underpin these standards.
Why trust our journalism?
Founded in 2003, Trusted Reviews exists to give our readers thorough, unbiased and independent advice on what to buy.
Today, we have millions of users a month from around the world, and assess more than 1,000 products a year.
Editorial independence means being able to give an unbiased verdict about a product or company, with the avoidance of conflicts of interest. To ensure this is possible, every member of the editorial staff follows a clear code of conduct.
We also expect our journalists to follow clear ethical standards in their work. Our staff members must strive for honesty and accuracy in everything they do. We follow the IPSO Editors’ code of practice to underpin these standards.
